The Persistent Connection Between Language- of-Interview and Latino Political Opinion
نویسندگان
چکیده
Since the advent of public opinion polling, scholars have extensively documented the relationship between survey response and interviewer characteristics, including race, ethnicity, and gender. This paper extends this literature to the domain of language-of-interview, with a focus on Latino political opinion. We ascertain whether, and to what degree, Latinos’ reported political attitudes vary by the language they interview in. Using several political surveys, including the 1989–1990 Latino National Political Survey and the 2006 Latino National Survey, we unearth two key patterns. First, language-of-interview produces substantively important differences of opinion between English and Spanish interviewees. This pattern is not isolated to attitudes that directly or indirectly involve Latinos (e.g., immigration policy, language policy). Indeed, it emerges even in the reporting of political facts. Second, the association between Latino opinion and language-ofinterview persists even after statistically controlling for, among other things, individual differences in education, national origin, citizenship status, and generational status. Together, these results suggest that a fuller understanding of the contours of Latino public opinion can benefit by acknowledging the influence of languageof-interview. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9229-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. T. Lee Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley, 210 Barrows Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1950, USA e-mail: [email protected] E. O. Pérez (&) Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University, PMB 505, 230 Appleton Place, Nashville, TN 37203, USA e-mail: [email protected] 123 Polit Behav (2014) 36:401–425 DOI 10.1007/s11109-013-9229-1 Author's personal copy
منابع مشابه
The Origins and Implications of Language Effects in Multilingual Surveys: A MIMIC Approach with Application to Latino Political Attitudes
The study of Latino public opinion has renewed interest in the relationship between language and survey response. However, extant research generally relies on statistical methods that cannot distinguish between two related yet distinct types of language effects in Latino surveys: (1) differences in attitude and (2) differences in measures of attitude. The former reflects varied levels of a late...
متن کاملLost in Translation? Item Validity in Bilingual Political Surveys
The dramatic increase in the U.S. Latino population in recent decades has spurred an equally dramatic rise in bilingual survey instruments used by scholars to gauge the political attitudes of this growing ethnic group. A key assumption behind these instruments is that English-language items tap the same political constructs as their Spanish-language analogs. This paper reports evidence which su...
متن کاملDiscourse Markers in Political Interviews: A Contrastive Study of Persian and English
Due to the significance of multiculturalism in politics, and the central role linguistic devices play in organizing the political discourse, this text-based qualitative study was carried out to compare political interviews in the Iranian and English contexts to find out the probable similarities and differences in the use of discourse markers (DMs) between the two cultures. To this end, three s...
متن کاملXenophobic Rhetoric and Its Political Effects on Immigrants and Their CoEthnics
Though political scientists generally understand the origins of native-born reactions to foreigners, less is known about how anti-immigrant contexts trigger a political response within immigrant groups. I address this question by studying the connection between xenophobic rhetoric and Latino politics. I claim that xenophobic rhetoric raises the salience of ethnic identity and impugns its worth....
متن کاملProstate Cancer Screening in Middle-Aged and Older American Men: Combined Effects of Ethnicity and Years of Schooling
Background: Prostate cancer screening is more commonly utilized by highly educated people. As shown by marginalization-related diminished returns (MDRs), the effects of socioeconomic status (SES) such as education on the health outcomes are considerably smaller for ethnic minorities than for Whites. The role of MDRs as a source of ethnic health disparities is, however, still un...
متن کامل